Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:59

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
McDonald's is facing a harsh new reality as customer behavior shifts - TheStreet
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
How do you cope when your mother doesn't love you?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
In what ways Indian parents are destroying their children's life?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Horoscope for Saturday, June 14, 2025 - Chicago Sun-Times
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What is your most intimate experience with your best friend?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
How humpback whales are playfully communicating with humans, according to scientists - ABC News